Saturday, October 29, 2011
Hall 1-2 (San Jose Convention Center)
The Gulf of Mexico is home to some of the world’s healthiest populations of Crassostrea virginica (Eastern Oyster). Oyster reefs provide Gulf Coast economies with thousands of jobs, critical environmental services and generate millions of dollars annually. As these economic and environmental services have become increasingly evident, concerns over lenient state and federal reef protection policies have surfaced. Texas and Louisiana are the foremost oyster producing states in the nation. This research evaluates the success of Texas’s and Louisiana’s reef protection strategies. Comparisons between their existing policies as well as the current/historical health of their oyster populations exposed the strengths and weakness of their respective strategies. Policies examined included size limits, catch limits, oyster season dates and gear restrictions. Other aspects of state policies investigated include the prevalence of private oyster leases and broodstock sanctuaries. Historical oyster reef health comparisons were implausible because hurricanes regularly damaged reefs. When viewed within the context of reef abundance, it is evident that protection policies are directly linked to reef abundance. Louisiana flaunts unrivaled oyster abundances and has laxer regulations than Texas which only possesses one major oyster habitat. This theory is further supported by the dredging regulations specific to the fragile ecosystems of Sabine and Calcasieu Lakes in Louisiana. Smaller reefs require stricter protection policies such as a shorter season, tighter gear restrictions and smaller catch limits. While both states have been relatively successful, the introduction of broodstock sanctuaries and an increase in the acreage of private leases in both states is recommended.