FRI-505 Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Fat Fraction Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging at High Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Friday, October 12, 2012: 9:00 PM
Hall 4E/F (WSCC)
Jorly Chatouphonexay , Mathematics, California State University, Fullerton, Stanton, CA
Angel Pineda, PhD , Mathematics, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming one of the most common liver conditions in western society since the rates of obesity and diabetes are rising.  The standard method for diagnosis of NAFLD is by a liver biopsy.  Yet, a liver biopsy is invasive and not representative since it samples 1/50,000th of the liver.  Our project involves the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive method to diagnose NAFLD.  NAFLD is diagnosed by quantifying the fat fraction, which is the amount of fat over the amount of fat and water.  We defined the true fat fraction as Ρtrue = μfat/(μfat + μwater) where μfat and μwater is the mean of the fat and water signal.  The magnitude and the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) methods estimate the fat fraction at high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).  SNR is the ratio of the mean over the standard deviation of the signal and is high when this ratio is at least 3.  With the magnitude method, the fat-fraction estimate is Ρmagnitude = |F|/(|F| + |W|). The magnitude of the fat and water signals, denoted as |F| and |W|, follow the Rician distribution.  However, at high SNR, they approximately follow a normal distribution.  With the MLE method, the fat-fraction estimate is ΡMLE = FMLE/(FMLE + WMLE) where FMLE and WMLE is the estimated fat and water signal. Finally, we will compare both methods by computing the mean squared error (MSE) to show that the MLE method estimates the fat fraction more accurately since it has a smaller MSE.