Thursday, October 29, 2015: 10:55 AM
Chesapeake 10 (Gaylord National Resort And Convention Center)
As part of their jobs, professional engineers and scientists engage in ethical, environmental, social, and economic negotiations with other engineers/scientists, with managers, and with the public; and they need to understand the social impact of new technologies in a global context. However, courses in ethics for scientists/engineers often emphasize the micro-ethics of research, mentoring, and publications. Research and curriculum is limited on how future engineers/scientists understand the social, ethical, environmental, economic, and political impact of their scientific and technological contributions. In this manuscript, we present 3 case-study accounts of how students think about a(n) scientist's/engineer’s responsibility towards the social and global impact of their contribution. The case studies draw from video-taped semi-structured interviews. Our case-study analysis suggests that how some engineering/science students construe their responsibility depends on the particular issue at hand (weaponized drones versus malfunctioning bridges, for example), on their sense of self as a future engineer, views about what is engineering, sense of nationality, emotions, empathy, and ideologies/narratives available to them through participation in the world at large.